BriansDreams.com© | specializing in dream analyzation & prediction, remote viewing, psychic detective case work, missing person advisor, spiritual teacher and more...

This is a remote viewing of the upcoming earthquake that will affect the San Francisco Bay Area

The quake will happen at 4:06 AM on a Thursday of the year 2006, and will be a magnitude of 8.2. There will be several small earthquakes starting 4 days before the main event. The first will be a 3.9, when this happens, there will be 4 days until the event. Two days prior to the main quake, a 4.1 earthquake will be recorded. Other details are drawn above, but I do not know what they mean.

Yesterday was the last day of the 100th Anniversary Earthquake Conference held in San Francisco, and I heard on the news they have found a new earthquake fault not previously known about. Also there was an article on 4/17/06 at BBC news.com UK version that had startling news of the effects of a quake scenario if it happened at San Juan Batista in Central California. You can read the whole article at www.crystalinks.com ,then scroll down to the article. Just thought you may want to pass this on to your readers. I think in your drawing when you wrote San Juan, you really meant San Juan Batista, and it makes perfect sense.

Hi again,

I've been staring at your drawings from this RV.

I suspect you have most of this down except maybe the map. I note that Thursday 4:06 am *may* be Thursday 9:06 am. It's sort of in between what you usually draw as a four and a nine. So alertness 5 hours later than 4:06 am may be appropriate. Might be a good day to be late for work :-)

On the first drawing, I think it the "San Juan" indicates that the quake at least involves San Juan Bautista. I think the way it is involved is that it will mark the southern end of the slip. I don't think it will be the epicenter.

San Juan Bautista to Eureka, where the San Andreas veers out to sea, is 300 miles. That I believe, is the length of the strike slip, from Eureka all the way down to San Juan Batista. That is a very lengthy slip. The 1906 quake ran from Cape Mendocino down to San Juan Bautista. The lateral movement of the ground was up to 21 feet in places.

Speaking of the 1906 quake, it was an 8.3 and was centered offshore just west of San Francisco. That is where the main San Andreas fault runs, as can be seen on the attached map of earthquakes and faultlines in the SF area (the ones to the east are branches of the Hayward fault).

Your RV'ing points to exactly the same place. In the first drawing you have "12 miles" and a left arrow. In the second you show what appears to be the SF peninsula, the Golden Gate Bridge, and the peninsula to the north of the Golden Gate Bridge. 12 miles to the west of the Golden Gate Bridge, give or take a mile, lies the San Andreas fault. You have indicated "breaks here" on your drawing. I conclude, prior to the evidence appearing, that the epicenter of your 8.2 quake will be right where it was in 1906. It will slip along the fault for a total of 300 miles.

Massive amounts of energy will be loaded at the south end of the slip zone and down for the 7.9 in LA. - the epicenter for which I would expect to see somewhere between Palmdale and San Bernardino, where the San Andreas runs north of the Transverse Range north of the major metropolitan areas. From there it could slip toward the Salton Sea past Palm Springs, or slip south on the San Jacinto fault. Toward the Salton Sea is traditional thinking for the main "highway" of the San Andreas, but energy is likely also to be released southward on the San Jacinto fault with a quake of this magnitude.

Here is a good article on what might be expected of an 8.2 centered just off the coast of San Francisco, right where the 1906 quake was:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/04/0413_060413_earthquake.html

I hope this does not come to pass. LA could be hit nearly as hard if energy transfers south from the Transverse Range along any number of fault lines.

Best
Scott

reply

Hi, thanks, when I do a RV I basically close my eyes and slow down my mind...then I start to see things...and all I do is try and draw what I see...it's really that simple...and most of the time, I have no idea what I'm drawing. Will post your information in hopes that it may help others.

5.22.2006

Dear Brian,

Because we cant hear from you I was looking at the San Francisco earthquake information. It came to me that it might not be San Juan Baptisto because you call it the SF Bay area. I think you meant to put down San Jose, CA which IS considered the SF bay area. That seemed to make more sense to me. Check it out again. Hows the new computer coming along? Hope you are having good luck with it and you are OK!

Your Friend,

Marilyn

reply

Hi, thanks, will look at this. Have fixed this one, but looking to get another.

Brian

6.13.2006

Hi Brian

This is regarding the possible 8.2 quake in California.

You predicted by remote viewing that there would be:

A 3.9 quake 4 days before

A 4.1 quake 2 days before

The other day you said there was 26 hours to a 5.2 Hokkaido, Japan quake. The result was actually a 5.1, but the time and place were right.

Now, please look at this:

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsww/Quakes/quakes_all.php

Assuming that this Thursday is "the day," we would have to see a 3.9 Sunday and a 4.1 Tuesday.

What we have is this:

First earthquake recorded Sunday: 4.9

First earthquake recorded Tuesday: 5.1

You have very often made mistakes of exactly 1.0 or 0.1 in magnitudes... Now I wouldn't be surprised if these 4.9 and 5.1 were the 3.9 and 4.1 we were waiting for...

I was wondering if you'd mind doing an extra remote viewing to see if indeed, the great San Francisco earthquake of 2006 was this Thursday.

Thanks for reading.

- Ben

reply

Hi Ben, just tried to do a RV and came up with nothing...not sure what this means.

I will post this new news ASAP...and thanks...

Brian

6.21.2006

Brian, Check this out, from Fox News this evening.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200453,00.html

Fits with your prediction of major California quake pending.

Best wishes,

Gooby

reply

Thanks, will do.

Brian

6.22.2006

Southern San Andreas fault waiting to explode

Expert believes Los Angeles area at risk for massive earthquake

Updated: 8:07 a.m. HT June 21, 2006

LONDON - The southern end of the San Andreas fault near Los Angeles, which has been still for more than two centuries, is under immense stress and could produce a massive earthquake at any moment, a scientist said Wednesday.

Yuri Fialko, of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at La Jolla, Calif., said that given average annual movement rates in other areas of the fault, there could be enough pent-up energy in the southern end to trigger a cataclysmic jolt of up to 32 feet (10 meters).

"The observed strain rates confirm that the southern section of the San Andreas fault may be approaching the end of the interseismic phase of the earthquake cycle," he wrote in the journal Nature

A sudden lateral movement of 23 to 32 feet (7 to 10 meters) would be among the largest ever recorded.

According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the earthquake that destroyed San Francisco in 1906 was produced by a sudden movement of the northern end of the fault of up to 21 feet (6.4 meters).

Fialko said there had been no recorded movement at the southern end of the fault — the 800-mile-long (1,280-kilometer-long) geological meeting point of the Pacific and the North American tectonic plates — since the dawn of European settlement in the area.

He said this lack of movement for 250 years correlated with the predicted gaps between major earthquakes at the southern end of the fault of between 200 and 300 years.

Elsewhere on the fault, there were average slippage rates up to a couple of centimeters a year that prevented the build-up of explosive pressure deep underground.

When these became blocked and then suddenly broke free, they produced tremors or earthquakes of varying intensity depending on the movement that had taken place before and the duration of the blockage.

USGS says the most recent major earthquakes in the northern and central zones of the San Andreas fault were in 1857 and 1906.

Three possible explanations
Fialko said there were three possible explanations for the lack of observed movement in the southern section: creepage under the surface that had no external manifestation, a scenario in which the section simply doesn't not move as much as the rest of the section, or a major blockage.

"Except for the first possibility above, the continued quiescence increases the likelihood of a future event," he wrote.

Making calculations based on a wide range of land and satellite observations, he discounted the idea of creepage and warned of impending disaster.

"Regardless of fault geometry and mechanical properties of the ambient crust, results presented in this study lend support to intermediate-term forecasts of a high probability of major earthquakes on the southern SAF system," Fialko said.

Thank you for this, will post it.

Brian

6.23.2006

hey, just thought you might be interested in this:

http://news.google.com/news?ned=us&ncl=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml%3Fxml%3D/news/2006/06/22/wquake22.xml%26sSheet%3D/news/2006/06/22/ixnews.html&hl=en

Nathan

reply

Thanks Nathan, will post these links.

Brian

SOS LINKS

PLEASE HELP, JOIN THE FORUM FOR THIS CASE HERE | REQUEST TO OPEN A NEW CASE | PENDING CASES

tell-a-friend about this page

Site Navigation

Home - Become a Member - Official Brian's Dreams Merchandise - Subliminal Store! - More About Me - Site News - Popular Dreams that have come true! - Verified Dreams - Spread the word - Last night's dreams - Dreams this month - Dreams archives - Dream thumbnails - Missing Persons Section - Missing Person Forum - Team Cases - Missing Persons Radio - Missing Database - Remote/Brian viewing - Free dream newsletter - Contact me - Invention dreams - Spread the word - Reader's letters and comments - Request a dream/pillow viewing - Donate - Free Lottery and Stock Picks - Proof of God and the human Soul - Secrets - Help Wanted - Sitemap